This is not my field but one has to be impressed with the pipe technology of 100 years ago. Perhaps not. This week's big break, the one that cost the region happened to pipes that were less than 100 years old. And there is much more rot that we can not see. The LA Daily News reported the following (but read the ):
The story ends with the predictable "give us more money." More money has been going to employee pension funding -- and even then there is a reported . We get the gap, high prices, floods, and . There is when there is a politically influential and unionized workforce.At 93 years old, the pipe that b was younger and in better condition than many of Los Angeles’s brittle, corroding water arteries.More than 1 million feet of the city’s pipes are beyond a century old — past their intended life spans — and this segment was not a high-priority replacement, according to reports reviewed and interviews conducted on Wednesday.While the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power has tried to ramp up water main replacements, it hasn’t met its goals. City officials and observers say the problem is money. Aging infrastructure is the largest problem here and at water utilities around the U.S., but unaware consumers are usually reluctant to pay.
The pipes are not visible to the layman but the roads are. LA's potholed roads are third-world quality. This morning's LA Times includes an which notes that better use of available funds should come before new funds are sought.
California water policy has always been wrong-headed. notes that the State has been selling very cheap water to farmers growing crops that get USDA price supports. We now have reports of a "drought" but the policy reasons for it do not make it into polite discussion. Polite discussion, he notes, is informed by the plot of .